header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Making amends

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty report on declining capacity, mutual wills & rectification

In Perrins v Holland [2010] EWCA Civ 840, the Court of Appeal reinforced and approved the well-known rule in Parker v Felgate (1883) LR 8 PD 171.

In April 2000, when he had testamentary capacity, R gave instructions for a will revoking a former will in D’s favour and leaving his entire estate to A. However, in September 2001, when he finally executed the will, R no longer had full capacity—although it was read and summarised to him, he approved it, and it continued to represent his testamentary intentions. At first instance, applying Parker v Felgate, Lewison J held that the will was therefore valid.

D appealed to the Court of Appeal, submitting that (i) the decision in Parker v Felgate was wrong; (ii) by definition R could not have known and approved of the will when executing it if he lacked full capacity at that time; and (iii) in applying the Parker v Felgate, Lewison

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll