header-logo header-logo

08 November 2016
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Martin Cannon—Browne Jacobson

martin_canon_press_use

Firm widens its construction offering

Browne Jacobson has broadened its construction and engineering offering in the West Midlands with the appointment of new partner Martin Cannon into its Birmingham office.

Martin, previously a partner at DAC Beachcroft LLP in Birmingham, has over 27 years’ experience in construction, projects/PFI and facilities management. He is an acknowledged expert in the resolution of contentious issues arising on PFI projects, including multi-million pound loss and expense and design defect cases. He also has extensive experience in the wider public sector market acting on contentious and non-contentious matters for health and local government bodies and those who supply services to them. The benefit of acting for both sides of the construction divide (clients and suppliers) and sitting as an adjudicator means that Martin is able to deliver to clients a wider perspective on their issues.

Tim Claremont, partner and head of Browne Jacobson’s construction and engineering team, commented on Martin’s appointment: “I am delighted to welcome Martin to the firm. He is a first class lawyer and will be a great fit with our existing and prospective clients as there is a real synergy between his portfolio and expertise and our current practice.

“His arrival represents an excellent opportunity for the construction and engineering team to grow both in the West Midlands region and nationally and to strengthen the firm’s public sector offering.”

Martin added: “I am extremely happy to be joining such an ambitious firm. Browne Jacobson has an excellent reputation as leading legal experts in a very competitive marketplace and a dynamic construction team that is going from strength to strength.”

Issue: 7722 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll