header-logo header-logo

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News , The Hague Convention
printer mail-detail

Master of the Rolls speaks out about online court

The proposed online court will ‘enhance’ the civil courts not create an online alternative to them, Sir Terence Etherton, Master of the Rolls has said.

Giving the Lord Slynn Memorial Lecture, Sir Terence reassured his audience that the recent failure of an online court in The Netherlands, the Rechtwijzer, on the grounds of financial sustainability does not cast doubt on the English and Welsh version. While the Rechtwijzer sat outside the court system, ‘our approach is to develop a court which incorporates online dispute resolution into its processes’, he said.

The proposed court, which does not yet have a name, will help claimants explore whether they have a viable claim. Case officers and court administrators will help parties manage their claim, and a judge will adjudicate via online or telephone communications.

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News , The Hague Convention
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll