header-logo header-logo

Master of the Rolls speaks out about online court

22 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News , The Hague Convention
printer mail-detail

The proposed online court will ‘enhance’ the civil courts not create an online alternative to them, Sir Terence Etherton, Master of the Rolls has said.

Giving the Lord Slynn Memorial Lecture, Sir Terence reassured his audience that the recent failure of an online court in The Netherlands, the Rechtwijzer, on the grounds of financial sustainability does not cast doubt on the English and Welsh version. While the Rechtwijzer sat outside the court system, ‘our approach is to develop a court which incorporates online dispute resolution into its processes’, he said.

The proposed court, which does not yet have a name, will help claimants explore whether they have a viable claim. Case officers and court administrators will help parties manage their claim, and a judge will adjudicate via online or telephone communications.

Issue: 7751 / Categories: Bar Council , Legal News , The Hague Convention
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll