header-logo header-logo

13 November 2009 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A matter of intent

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter consider the complexities of sham employment terms & the true nature of the contractual relationship

The question of whether a person doing a job of work is an employee (and, as such, able to benefit from the breadth of protection afforded to such status by employment law) or merely a worker, or some other status (for example an independent contractor, who is self-employed) is a vexed one.

Courts at senior levels have laid down various guidelines, which have been subjected to scrutiny and analysis by the lower courts. However, recent authority has now confirmed that the courts should search for the true intention of the parties and not be bound by the strict wording of the contract if this does not reflect reality.

The Court of Appeal (Smith, Sedley and Aikens LJJ) handed down its judgment in the case of Autoclenz ltd v Belcher and Others [2009] EWCA Civ 1046, [2009] All ER (D) 134 (Oct) last month.

Autoclenz was a company that cleaned cars ready

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll