header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Victoria Thompson , Paul Solon
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A matter of trust

Paul Solon and Victoria Thompson consider how proposed changes to capital gains tax will affect non resident trusts

The government has been promising a review of the residence and domicile regime for many years, and practitioners have grown accustomed to waiting in vain for the publication of concrete proposals. However, in his Pre Budget Report (PBR) last October, the chancellor announced that the wait was over and that legislation would be introduced in the Finance Bill 2008 (see key points box below).

The chancellor promised that consultation on the detail of the changes—and on further changes for longer term residents— would be published towards the end of 2007 and, on 16 December, the consultation document Paying a Fairer Share: a Consultation on Residence and Domicile was published. This gave some more details about the proposals but it was not until the draft legislation was published last month that the full picture has emerged.
If the draft legislation is implemented in its current form, the changes it will introduce will
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll