header-logo header-logo

25 February 2011 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

McKenzie Friends United

Peter Thompson QC fights the corner of a tried & trusted friend

McKenzie Friends are in trouble. They may not yet have read the new Practice Guidance on the subject that was issued by the master of the rolls and the president of the Family Division last July; but when they do they will see that they need to smarten up their act and perhaps create their own website!

For a reminder of their humble origins we must turn back to the speech of Lord Tenterden CJ in Collier v Hicks [1831] 2 B & Ad 663: “Any person, whether he be a professional man (or woman) or not, may attend as the friend of either party, may take notes, may quietly make suggestions, and give advice; but no one can demand to take part in the proceedings as an advocate, contrary to the regulations of the court.” The text was adopted with approval by the Court of Appeal in McKenzie v McKenzie [1970] 3 All ER 1034. As a result, litigants in person

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll