header-logo header-logo

Med-Arb: a successful combination for beneficiaries?

28 November 2019
Issue: 7866 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
12260
Dr James Behrens considers the pros & cons of evaluative mediation in resolving trust & estate disputes
  • Should mediation be a facilitative, not an evaluative, process?
  • A mediator is not being paid to give legal advice.

There are many reasons to use mediation for trust and estate disputes. Mediation avoids frittering away the trust assets through litigation, and so preserves them for the beneficiaries; it helps to avoid any escalation of family conflicts; it aids in preserving long-term relationships between the trustees and the beneficiaries, as well as the relationships between the beneficiaries themselves.

This can be achieved thanks to the privacy, informality and confidentiality of the mediation process and also because of the flexibility in the types of solutions which mediation can achieve. For example, when it comes to varying the trust to obtain a tax advantage, there is much to be said in favour of using it. Also, a refusal to mediate may lead to adverse costs consequences in subsequent litigation. A party who refuses to mediate and subsequently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll