header-logo header-logo

28 November 2019
Issue: 7866 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Med-Arb: a successful combination for beneficiaries?

12260
Dr James Behrens considers the pros & cons of evaluative mediation in resolving trust & estate disputes
  • Should mediation be a facilitative, not an evaluative, process?
  • A mediator is not being paid to give legal advice.

There are many reasons to use mediation for trust and estate disputes. Mediation avoids frittering away the trust assets through litigation, and so preserves them for the beneficiaries; it helps to avoid any escalation of family conflicts; it aids in preserving long-term relationships between the trustees and the beneficiaries, as well as the relationships between the beneficiaries themselves.

This can be achieved thanks to the privacy, informality and confidentiality of the mediation process and also because of the flexibility in the types of solutions which mediation can achieve. For example, when it comes to varying the trust to obtain a tax advantage, there is much to be said in favour of using it. Also, a refusal to mediate may lead to adverse costs consequences in subsequent litigation. A party who refuses to mediate and subsequently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll