header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Media law update

Athelstane Aamodt warns against the rash & ill-considered use of Twitter

 

  • Rash and ill-considered use of Twitter has recently led to high-profile libel action.
  • The idea that the ‘Twittersphere’ requires some kind of special consideration because it is not a serious arena of debate and expression is no longer the case.
  • Where harassment is alleged, the tort is not complete unless and until it impacts upon the person concerned.

On 4 November 2012, Sally Bercow, the wife of the Speaker of the House of Commons, published a tweet that has since become infamous. It read: ‘Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *Innocent face*’

As is now well known, Alistair McAlpine (Lord McAlpine of West Green) had, at the time of Ms Bercow’s published tweet, been wrongly implicated in a child-abuse scandal that had been reported on television and in the press, and that implication resulted in false rumours circulating on Twitter and—as a consequence—his name started trending. Ms Bercow’s tweet resulted in libel proceedings being brought by Lord McAlpine against Ms Bercow. In Ms

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll