header-logo header-logo

To mediate or not to mediate?

Catriona Stewart discusses the possible cost consequences of delayed or abandoned mediation attempts

Can a party avoid a costs sanction if they choose not to mediate? The recent case of Car Giant Limited and Anor v London Borough of Hammersmith [2017] EWHC 464 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 104 (Mar) would indicate possibly, but only if based on well-thought grounds which are communicated to the other party.

Costs judgment

Car Giant concerned a costs judgment where the claimants had failed to beat a Pt 36 offer. The court was asked to award costs both before and after the expiry of the relevant period on an indemnity basis. The argument in support of the later period was that there had been an unreasonable delay in agreeing to mediate. The delay was from 15 May 2015 until October 2016. The court considered that it should be slow to criticise a party’s behaviour where decisions such as when to mediate are matters

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll