header-logo header-logo

To mediate or not to mediate?

Catriona Stewart discusses the possible cost consequences of delayed or abandoned mediation attempts

Can a party avoid a costs sanction if they choose not to mediate? The recent case of Car Giant Limited and Anor v London Borough of Hammersmith [2017] EWHC 464 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 104 (Mar) would indicate possibly, but only if based on well-thought grounds which are communicated to the other party.

Costs judgment

Car Giant concerned a costs judgment where the claimants had failed to beat a Pt 36 offer. The court was asked to award costs both before and after the expiry of the relevant period on an indemnity basis. The argument in support of the later period was that there had been an unreasonable delay in agreeing to mediate. The delay was from 15 May 2015 until October 2016. The court considered that it should be slow to criticise a party’s behaviour where decisions such as when to mediate are matters

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll