header-logo header-logo

Mediate—or pay the price

01 February 2007 / William Gibson
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features , Costs , Fees
printer mail-detail

A hike in court fees would encourage more mediation in costs disputes, reports William Gibson

There are rumours on the grapevine that the percentage-based court fee for costs assessments will return. Before April 1999 there was a major incentive for parties in litigation to settle the resulting costs claim by negotiation or mediation. Referring the matter to court for adjudication on a fair and reasonable costs figure attracted a taxing fee of 7.5% of the total value of the bill, half of which was paid in advance when the papers were lodged in court.

The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), surprisingly, abolished this lucrative source of revenue and replaced it with a flat fee, originally £160 in the High Court, currently £600. Suddenly bills in seven-figure amounts, which would have attracted an additional payment in excess of £75,000 to have a court assessment, could go through the same process for a nominal sum. Now, when even cases which settle before action can have costs-only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll