header-logo header-logo

01 February 2007 / William Gibson
Issue: 7258 / Categories: Features , Costs , Fees
printer mail-detail

Mediate—or pay the price

A hike in court fees would encourage more mediation in costs disputes, reports William Gibson

There are rumours on the grapevine that the percentage-based court fee for costs assessments will return. Before April 1999 there was a major incentive for parties in litigation to settle the resulting costs claim by negotiation or mediation. Referring the matter to court for adjudication on a fair and reasonable costs figure attracted a taxing fee of 7.5% of the total value of the bill, half of which was paid in advance when the papers were lodged in court.

The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), surprisingly, abolished this lucrative source of revenue and replaced it with a flat fee, originally £160 in the High Court, currently £600. Suddenly bills in seven-figure amounts, which would have attracted an additional payment in excess of £75,000 to have a court assessment, could go through the same process for a nominal sum. Now, when even cases which settle before action can have costs-only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll