header-logo header-logo

01 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation , Legal aid focus , ADR , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Mediation crisis on horizon

Increasing numbers of family mediators are cutting back on legal aid work or leaving the sector altogether due to low fees—creating a supply shortfall for low-income families

According to the Family Mediation Council (FMC), legal aid rates paid to mediators have remained unchanged for 25 years, leading to a 50% reduction since 2018 in the number of family mediators offering legal aid services. Consequently, families are having to wait longer for their initial mediation information and assessment meeting (MIAM) if they are on legal aid rather than paying privately.

The FMC report, ‘The state of family mediation’, published last week, states: ‘About a quarter of mediators who offer legal aid have stopped taking on new legal aid cases in the past year.

‘Furthermore, 55% say they envisage a point over the next year where they/their firm will need to stop taking on new legal aid cases, or ringfence time spent on them. The reduction in legal aid mediators is primarily driven by mediators not being able to afford to offer services on legal aid rates.’

Overall, however, the report found the amount of family mediation is growing, with a ‘particular increase’ since the court rules were amended in 2024 to encourage parties to consider non-court dispute resolution. According to Ministry of Justice statistics for 2023, 69% of mediations resolved the issues so the case did not go to court or went only for a consent order. Generally, only one in three potential mediations fail due to lack of participation by one of the parties.

FMC CEO Helen Anthony said the report found ‘awareness of family mediation is higher among the general public and professionals working with families. Access to family mediation is easier for many separating couples, and assurance of family mediation standards provides greater confidence in the quality of services’.

Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation , Legal aid focus , ADR , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll