header-logo header-logo

01 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation , Legal aid focus , ADR , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Mediation crisis on horizon

Increasing numbers of family mediators are cutting back on legal aid work or leaving the sector altogether due to low fees—creating a supply shortfall for low-income families

According to the Family Mediation Council (FMC), legal aid rates paid to mediators have remained unchanged for 25 years, leading to a 50% reduction since 2018 in the number of family mediators offering legal aid services. Consequently, families are having to wait longer for their initial mediation information and assessment meeting (MIAM) if they are on legal aid rather than paying privately.

The FMC report, ‘The state of family mediation’, published last week, states: ‘About a quarter of mediators who offer legal aid have stopped taking on new legal aid cases in the past year.

‘Furthermore, 55% say they envisage a point over the next year where they/their firm will need to stop taking on new legal aid cases, or ringfence time spent on them. The reduction in legal aid mediators is primarily driven by mediators not being able to afford to offer services on legal aid rates.’

Overall, however, the report found the amount of family mediation is growing, with a ‘particular increase’ since the court rules were amended in 2024 to encourage parties to consider non-court dispute resolution. According to Ministry of Justice statistics for 2023, 69% of mediations resolved the issues so the case did not go to court or went only for a consent order. Generally, only one in three potential mediations fail due to lack of participation by one of the parties.

FMC CEO Helen Anthony said the report found ‘awareness of family mediation is higher among the general public and professionals working with families. Access to family mediation is easier for many separating couples, and assurance of family mediation standards provides greater confidence in the quality of services’.

Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation , Legal aid focus , ADR , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll