header-logo header-logo

01 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation , Legal aid focus , ADR , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Mediation crisis on horizon

Increasing numbers of family mediators are cutting back on legal aid work or leaving the sector altogether due to low fees—creating a supply shortfall for low-income families

According to the Family Mediation Council (FMC), legal aid rates paid to mediators have remained unchanged for 25 years, leading to a 50% reduction since 2018 in the number of family mediators offering legal aid services. Consequently, families are having to wait longer for their initial mediation information and assessment meeting (MIAM) if they are on legal aid rather than paying privately.

The FMC report, ‘The state of family mediation’, published last week, states: ‘About a quarter of mediators who offer legal aid have stopped taking on new legal aid cases in the past year.

‘Furthermore, 55% say they envisage a point over the next year where they/their firm will need to stop taking on new legal aid cases, or ringfence time spent on them. The reduction in legal aid mediators is primarily driven by mediators not being able to afford to offer services on legal aid rates.’

Overall, however, the report found the amount of family mediation is growing, with a ‘particular increase’ since the court rules were amended in 2024 to encourage parties to consider non-court dispute resolution. According to Ministry of Justice statistics for 2023, 69% of mediations resolved the issues so the case did not go to court or went only for a consent order. Generally, only one in three potential mediations fail due to lack of participation by one of the parties.

FMC CEO Helen Anthony said the report found ‘awareness of family mediation is higher among the general public and professionals working with families. Access to family mediation is easier for many separating couples, and assurance of family mediation standards provides greater confidence in the quality of services’.

Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation , Legal aid focus , ADR , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll