header-logo header-logo

Mediation: upping the tempo

03 July 2008 / Steven Friel
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

Political and judicial support for mediation is increasing, says Steven Friel

The political and judicial arguments in favour of mediation as a preferred form of dispute resolution have been recently strengthened. On the political level, the EU has approved a new Mediation Directive (Directive 2008/52/EC) to encourage the use of mediation in cross-border disputes. This Directive has been supported throughout by the British government, which has indicated that it welcomes the final version. As to the judiciary, Sir Anthony Clarke MR, on 8 May 2008 gave a speech in which he called for mediation to become an integral part of our litigation culture, going so far as to support the notion of compulsory mediation in certain cases.

As long ago as October 1999, the heads of state or government of the EU member states called for the creation across Europe of alternative, extrajudicial procedures for dispute resolution to improve access to justice at the European level. Following a 2002 green paper on the subject, two initiatives were agreed. The first, a European Code

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll