header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008 / Steven Friel
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

Mediation: upping the tempo

Political and judicial support for mediation is increasing, says Steven Friel

The political and judicial arguments in favour of mediation as a preferred form of dispute resolution have been recently strengthened. On the political level, the EU has approved a new Mediation Directive (Directive 2008/52/EC) to encourage the use of mediation in cross-border disputes. This Directive has been supported throughout by the British government, which has indicated that it welcomes the final version. As to the judiciary, Sir Anthony Clarke MR, on 8 May 2008 gave a speech in which he called for mediation to become an integral part of our litigation culture, going so far as to support the notion of compulsory mediation in certain cases.

As long ago as October 1999, the heads of state or government of the EU member states called for the creation across Europe of alternative, extrajudicial procedures for dispute resolution to improve access to justice at the European level. Following a 2002 green paper on the subject, two initiatives were agreed. The first, a European Code

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll