header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / Amanda Wadey
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Mediator in the witness box?

Amanda Wadey considers the first ever case of a mediator being summoned to give evidence

One of the many reasons for disputing parties to attempt mediation as a method of resolving their quarrel is the confidentiality that covers the process. This is usually enshrined in the mediation agreement.
However, Farm Assist v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2009] All ER (D) 228 (Jun) shows that the court will always consider the interests of justice above any agreements reached by the parties on confidentiality; the agreement will only form a part of the court’s decision.

Facts of the case

Farm Assist (FAL) was seeking to set aside a settlement agreement entered into following a mediation with Defra, on the grounds of economic duress.
The mediation took place in 2003. The mediator and the parties had entered into a mediation agreement containing the usual provisions about confidentiality. Specifically (in summary); All communications were to be without privilege; None of the parties would call the Mediator as witness in any

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll