header-logo header-logo

17 May 2013 / Ross Rymkiewicz
Issue: 7560 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Meeting the test

How does an English court decide if a claimant will be unable to obtain a fair trial abroad, asks Ross Rymkiewicz

VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp & Ors [2013] UKSC 5 is the latest in a series of cases in which the court has considered the availability of a fair trial for a claimant before a foreign court when deciding whether to grant a stay or permit service out of the jurisdiction on forum non conveniens grounds.

Given the popularity of the English courts as a neutral forum for resolving disputes, this topic looks set to be aired before the courts with increasingly regularity. However, this line of cases shows a reluctance by the courts to set rigid rules as to precisely what will and will not suffice as “positive and cogent evidence” for proving the “real risk” that justice will not be obtained in the foreign court by reason of “incompetence or lack of independence or corruption” (per Lord Collins in AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Limited & Ors

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll