header-logo header-logo

03 May 2024 / Nabila Mallick
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Harassment
printer mail-detail

Menstruation & the menopause: righting wrongs at work

169545
Nabila Mallick discusses the law & potential legal developments relating to menstruation & menopause in the workplace
  • Covers case law on employment claims concerning menstruation or menopause.
  • Considers potential for bringing such claims.

Despite women comprising 48% of the workforce, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) fails, surprisingly, to provide protection from discrimination or harassment for the specific characteristics of menstruation or menopause, which together span the entirety of the average woman’s working life. This has meant that the issue is ignored by employers in workplace policies and, in turn, female employees often remain silent while suffering from sometimes debilitating symptoms. Most women simply do not know how they could be protected.

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) in 2019 found that 73% of women aged 40 to 60 have experienced menopausal symptoms, with more than half able to think of a time when they couldn’t work due to their symptoms. Further, 67% of women identified with negative experiences in the workplace and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll