header-logo header-logo

03 May 2024 / Nabila Mallick
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Harassment
printer mail-detail

Menstruation & the menopause: righting wrongs at work

169545
Nabila Mallick discusses the law & potential legal developments relating to menstruation & menopause in the workplace
  • Covers case law on employment claims concerning menstruation or menopause.
  • Considers potential for bringing such claims.

Despite women comprising 48% of the workforce, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) fails, surprisingly, to provide protection from discrimination or harassment for the specific characteristics of menstruation or menopause, which together span the entirety of the average woman’s working life. This has meant that the issue is ignored by employers in workplace policies and, in turn, female employees often remain silent while suffering from sometimes debilitating symptoms. Most women simply do not know how they could be protected.

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) in 2019 found that 73% of women aged 40 to 60 have experienced menopausal symptoms, with more than half able to think of a time when they couldn’t work due to their symptoms. Further, 67% of women identified with negative experiences in the workplace and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll