header-logo header-logo

Menstruation & the menopause: righting wrongs at work

03 May 2024 / Nabila Mallick
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Harassment
printer mail-detail
169545
Nabila Mallick discusses the law & potential legal developments relating to menstruation & menopause in the workplace
  • Covers case law on employment claims concerning menstruation or menopause.
  • Considers potential for bringing such claims.

Despite women comprising 48% of the workforce, the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) fails, surprisingly, to provide protection from discrimination or harassment for the specific characteristics of menstruation or menopause, which together span the entirety of the average woman’s working life. This has meant that the issue is ignored by employers in workplace policies and, in turn, female employees often remain silent while suffering from sometimes debilitating symptoms. Most women simply do not know how they could be protected.

The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) in 2019 found that 73% of women aged 40 to 60 have experienced menopausal symptoms, with more than half able to think of a time when they couldn’t work due to their symptoms. Further, 67% of women identified with negative experiences in the workplace and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll