header-logo header-logo

Mental capacity & detention

10 October 2014 / Tim Spencer-Lane
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Opinion , Mental health
printer mail-detail
cover_5

Tim Spencer-Lane provides an overview of the Law Commission’s review of the deprivation of liberty safeguards

In July 2014 the Law Commission published its 12th programme of law reform. Included in the programme is a project to review the law governing the detention and treatment of people who lack mental capacity.

Originally, the review was limited to considering how detentions should be authorised in community settings, while learning lessons for the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005). However, in response to recent developments and following consultation with stakeholders and the Law Commission, the Department of Health has asked us to extend the scope of this work to include considering the legislation underpinning the DoLS in its entirety (in addition to community settings).

A chequered history

  • The DoLS were introduced into MCA 2005 by the Mental Health Act 2007. Essentially they ensure a professional assessment takes place of whether the person lacks capacity to make decisions about their care and treatment and whether it is in their
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll