header-logo header-logo

Mental capacity & detention

10 October 2014 / Tim Spencer-Lane
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Opinion , Mental health
printer mail-detail
cover_5

Tim Spencer-Lane provides an overview of the Law Commission’s review of the deprivation of liberty safeguards

In July 2014 the Law Commission published its 12th programme of law reform. Included in the programme is a project to review the law governing the detention and treatment of people who lack mental capacity.

Originally, the review was limited to considering how detentions should be authorised in community settings, while learning lessons for the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005). However, in response to recent developments and following consultation with stakeholders and the Law Commission, the Department of Health has asked us to extend the scope of this work to include considering the legislation underpinning the DoLS in its entirety (in addition to community settings).

A chequered history

  • The DoLS were introduced into MCA 2005 by the Mental Health Act 2007. Essentially they ensure a professional assessment takes place of whether the person lacks capacity to make decisions about their care and treatment and whether it is in their
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll