header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7625

09 October 2014
IN THIS ISSUE

Ruth Daniel discusses how to provide access to justice for those most in need

Tim Spencer-Lane provides an overview of the Law Commission’s review of the deprivation of liberty safeguards

Should employees be paid to sleep? Tom Walker reports

David Burrows reviews the complexities & challenges of law making

Helen Sculthorpe explains how the Upper Tribunal has put relativity & professional valuation in the spotlight

Global Draw Ltd v IGT-UK Group Ltd and another [2014] EWHC 2973 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 86 (Sep)

Eurokey Recycling Ltd v Giles Insurance Brokers [2014] EWHC 2989 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 92 (Sep)

Brand and another v Berki [2014] EWHC 2979 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 99 (Sep)

Holger Forstmann Transporte GmbH & Co KG v Hauptzollamt Munster C-152/13 , [2014] All ER (D) 115 (Sep)

Technische Universitat Darmstadt v Eugen Ulmer KG C-117/13, [2014] All ER (D) 91 (Sep)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll