header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / Ruth Daniel
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pro pro bono

daniel

Ruth Daniel discusses how to provide access to justice for those most in need

Following the recent cuts in central and local government funding for free legal advice, the demand for pro bono has dramatically increased. In July 2014 the Bar Pro Bono Unit saw referrals increase by 51% compared with July 2013 and LawWorks have seen a 25% increase in cases at its clinics.

This increased demand creates a corresponding need for an increase in funding. Lawyers continue to offer their time for free, but without advice agencies such as Law Centres and clearing houses such as the Bar Pro Bono Unit, those lawyers would have nowhere to go.

The Access to Justice Foundation aims to improve access to justice for the most vulnerable in society, and works strategically to fund organisations which provide free legal help to those most in need. Following the devastating legal aid and other funding cuts, the Foundation has focused its resources on the provision of national infrastructure alongside ensuring services at front line organisations are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll