header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / Ruth Daniel
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pro pro bono

daniel

Ruth Daniel discusses how to provide access to justice for those most in need

Following the recent cuts in central and local government funding for free legal advice, the demand for pro bono has dramatically increased. In July 2014 the Bar Pro Bono Unit saw referrals increase by 51% compared with July 2013 and LawWorks have seen a 25% increase in cases at its clinics.

This increased demand creates a corresponding need for an increase in funding. Lawyers continue to offer their time for free, but without advice agencies such as Law Centres and clearing houses such as the Bar Pro Bono Unit, those lawyers would have nowhere to go.

The Access to Justice Foundation aims to improve access to justice for the most vulnerable in society, and works strategically to fund organisations which provide free legal help to those most in need. Following the devastating legal aid and other funding cuts, the Foundation has focused its resources on the provision of national infrastructure alongside ensuring services at front line organisations are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll