header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / Ruth Daniel
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Pro pro bono

daniel

Ruth Daniel discusses how to provide access to justice for those most in need

Following the recent cuts in central and local government funding for free legal advice, the demand for pro bono has dramatically increased. In July 2014 the Bar Pro Bono Unit saw referrals increase by 51% compared with July 2013 and LawWorks have seen a 25% increase in cases at its clinics.

This increased demand creates a corresponding need for an increase in funding. Lawyers continue to offer their time for free, but without advice agencies such as Law Centres and clearing houses such as the Bar Pro Bono Unit, those lawyers would have nowhere to go.

The Access to Justice Foundation aims to improve access to justice for the most vulnerable in society, and works strategically to fund organisations which provide free legal help to those most in need. Following the devastating legal aid and other funding cuts, the Foundation has focused its resources on the provision of national infrastructure alongside ensuring services at front line organisations are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll