header-logo header-logo

Precedent & practice

10 October 2014 / David Burrows
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
burrows_0

David Burrows reviews the complexities & challenges of law making

Over the next few weeks family law reformers and users of the family courts can look forward to the fruit of at least three consultations proposed by Sir James Munby P and the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary Office. It is therefore appropriate to consider the role of law-making – substantive and delegated; common law and precedent; and practice rules – especially as it is applied in family proceedings. In particular advisers are entitled (or have a duty) to ask: has this rule or that practice direction been made lawfully? The main consultation subjects are:

  • Transparency – The Next Steps . A consultation paper issued by the President of the Family Division on 15 August 2014.
  • Vulnerable Witness Working Group: see Interim Report of the Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group (31 July 2014).
  • Draft family orders—a compendium of which is available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/high-court-family-orders.

In the background we have:

  • The Report of the Financial Remedies Working Group (31 July 2014).
  • Litigants in
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Kingsley Napley—Tristan Cox-Chung

Firm bolsters restructuring and insolvency team with partner hire

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Foot Anstey—Stephen Arnold

Firm appoints first chief client officer

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

Mewburn Ellis—Aled Richards-Jones

IP firm welcomes experienced patent litigator as partner

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
back-to-top-scroll