header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / David Burrows
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Precedent & practice

burrows_0

David Burrows reviews the complexities & challenges of law making

Over the next few weeks family law reformers and users of the family courts can look forward to the fruit of at least three consultations proposed by Sir James Munby P and the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary Office. It is therefore appropriate to consider the role of law-making – substantive and delegated; common law and precedent; and practice rules – especially as it is applied in family proceedings. In particular advisers are entitled (or have a duty) to ask: has this rule or that practice direction been made lawfully? The main consultation subjects are:

  • Transparency – The Next Steps . A consultation paper issued by the President of the Family Division on 15 August 2014.
  • Vulnerable Witness Working Group: see Interim Report of the Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group (31 July 2014).
  • Draft family orders—a compendium of which is available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/high-court-family-orders.

In the background we have:

  • The Report of the Financial Remedies Working Group (31 July 2014).
  • Litigants in
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll