header-logo header-logo

10 October 2014 / David Burrows
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Precedent & practice

burrows_0

David Burrows reviews the complexities & challenges of law making

Over the next few weeks family law reformers and users of the family courts can look forward to the fruit of at least three consultations proposed by Sir James Munby P and the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary Office. It is therefore appropriate to consider the role of law-making – substantive and delegated; common law and precedent; and practice rules – especially as it is applied in family proceedings. In particular advisers are entitled (or have a duty) to ask: has this rule or that practice direction been made lawfully? The main consultation subjects are:

  • Transparency – The Next Steps . A consultation paper issued by the President of the Family Division on 15 August 2014.
  • Vulnerable Witness Working Group: see Interim Report of the Children and Vulnerable Witnesses Working Group (31 July 2014).
  • Draft family orders—a compendium of which is available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/high-court-family-orders.

In the background we have:

  • The Report of the Financial Remedies Working Group (31 July 2014).
  • Litigants in
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll