header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mental health

Coombs v Dorset NHS Primary Care Trust and another [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 42 (Apr)

A detained patient was in a very different position to one who was not subject to compulsory detention. The detaining authority had powers to control, not only the patient’s placement and treatment, as provided for in the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983), but also many more general activities and freedoms. So long as a person remained detained, any decision about his placement had to be made in accordance with MHA 1983 by the managers of the hospital where he was being detained.

Any decision about his treatment had to be made by his responsible clinician. If a patient, by electing to pay for treatment or care, thereby gained the ability or right to choose the treatment, then that would be inconsistent with the statutory scheme. There was no reason in principle why any practical difficulties should deprive a patient of the right to choose to pay if he so wished.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck—Tomas Vail

Carter-Ruck strengthens International team with appointment of arbitration partner Tomas Vail

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis—Nick Terry

Slater Heelis strengthens crime and regulatory team with appointment of Nick Terry as partner

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach—Thomas Moran & Sarah Gogan

Payne Hicks Beach strengthens private wealth offering with appointment of two new partners

NEWS
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
A formidable reputation cannot protect a law firm when partner departures, fragile finances and client uncertainty begin feeding each other
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
back-to-top-scroll