header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Mental health

Coombs v Dorset NHS Primary Care Trust and another [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 42 (Apr)

A detained patient was in a very different position to one who was not subject to compulsory detention. The detaining authority had powers to control, not only the patient’s placement and treatment, as provided for in the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA 1983), but also many more general activities and freedoms. So long as a person remained detained, any decision about his placement had to be made in accordance with MHA 1983 by the managers of the hospital where he was being detained.

Any decision about his treatment had to be made by his responsible clinician. If a patient, by electing to pay for treatment or care, thereby gained the ability or right to choose the treatment, then that would be inconsistent with the statutory scheme. There was no reason in principle why any practical difficulties should deprive a patient of the right to choose to pay if he so wished.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll