header-logo header-logo

02 December 2021
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

mfg Solicitors—Peter Copsey & Ben Rothery

Kidderminster lawyer to retire after 45 years
Commercial property expert Peter Copsey, a consultant and former partner and vice chairman at law firm mfg Solicitors, has announced he is to retire at the end of this year after a career spanning almost 45 years.

Mr Copsey, 66, joined mfg Solicitors in 1984 and became a partner just 18 months later. He went on to handle a number of high profile agricultural, commercial and corporate cases, also playing a role in a number of local charities.

A popular and well-known figure across Wyre Forest and the Black Country, he will hand over to partner and commercial property expert, Ben Rothery, who has worked closely with Mr Copsey for several years.

Peter said: 'After nearly 45 years I feel it is a perfect time to retire and pass things onto the next generation. I’ve loved meeting with and advising so many people over the years but now is definitely the time to take it a little easier and spend more quality time with my wife, my children, my young grandchildren and my elderly mother. I am also looking forward to travelling more.

Speaking of Ben Rothery, Peter said: 'Ben is the perfect person to take our commercial property work forward. Our clients are in good hands and I wish everyone well for what I am certain will be a successful future.'

Maynard Burton, chairman of mfg Solicitors added: 'I have had the pleasure of working closely with Peter for the whole time he has been with the firm. I cannot speak highly enough of him as a solicitor and as a person. He really is such a popular person and that’s because of his kindness, hard work and willingness to help anyone. We will miss him but I know he is going to enjoy a really happy and well-deserved retirement, safe in the knowledge he is passing things on to Ben who is a real rising star in the legal industry. On behalf of everyone here at mfg Solicitors, I’d like to wish Peter all the best for his retirement and I know we will stay in close touch with him.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll