header-logo header-logo

16 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Mind the gender pay gap!

Prime minister vows to eliminate gender penalty within a generation

New regulations are to be introduced forcing companies with more than 250 employees to disclose data on equal pay.

Launching a consultation on the proposal this week, Prime Minister David Cameron vowed to eliminate the gender pay gap “within a generation”. The gap between men and women’s pay is currently 19.1%, meaning women earn about £0.80 for every £1 earned by men, according to the Government Equalities Office.

Legislation to introduce the measure was passed in the last Parliament. The consultation, “Closing the Gender Pay Gap”, looks at the detail on what might be published, and when, among other matters.

Mandatory gender pay gap reporting will be introduced in the first half of 2016, but may be phased in to give smaller companies time to prepare. Support for employers could include workshops, seminars and software to help companies make the calculations. They would be required to publish the data every year or less frequently, and possibly on their website.

Ed Stacey,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll