header-logo header-logo

10 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Ministerial powers ‘inappropriate’

Peers have lambasted the government’s use of delegated powers for ‘executive convenience’ in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018

According to a House of Lords Constitution Committee report this week, ‘Brexit legislation: constitutional issues’, delegated powers should be used only where their use can be ‘clearly anticipated and defined’, constrained as far as is possible and subject to sunset clauses. Moreover, it is ‘in general constitutionally unacceptable’ to use delegated powers to create criminal offences yet the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill gives ministers powers to set sanctions of up to ten years’ imprisonment.

The Peers branded ministerial powers to determine which courts can depart from European Court of Justice case law ‘inappropriate’. They highlighted a ‘significant risk’ that these powers could undermine legal certainty, and called on the government to publish in draft any regulations it intends to make using these powers so that ‘substantive consultation’ can take place.

They warned ‘COVID-19 must not blind us to the challenges’ as Parliament scrutinises Brexit.

 

Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll