header-logo header-logo

Ministerial powers ‘inappropriate’

10 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Peers have lambasted the government’s use of delegated powers for ‘executive convenience’ in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018

According to a House of Lords Constitution Committee report this week, ‘Brexit legislation: constitutional issues’, delegated powers should be used only where their use can be ‘clearly anticipated and defined’, constrained as far as is possible and subject to sunset clauses. Moreover, it is ‘in general constitutionally unacceptable’ to use delegated powers to create criminal offences yet the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill gives ministers powers to set sanctions of up to ten years’ imprisonment.

The Peers branded ministerial powers to determine which courts can depart from European Court of Justice case law ‘inappropriate’. They highlighted a ‘significant risk’ that these powers could undermine legal certainty, and called on the government to publish in draft any regulations it intends to make using these powers so that ‘substantive consultation’ can take place.

They warned ‘COVID-19 must not blind us to the challenges’ as Parliament scrutinises Brexit.

 

Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll