header-logo header-logo

Ministerial powers ‘inappropriate’

10 June 2020
Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Peers have lambasted the government’s use of delegated powers for ‘executive convenience’ in the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018

According to a House of Lords Constitution Committee report this week, ‘Brexit legislation: constitutional issues’, delegated powers should be used only where their use can be ‘clearly anticipated and defined’, constrained as far as is possible and subject to sunset clauses. Moreover, it is ‘in general constitutionally unacceptable’ to use delegated powers to create criminal offences yet the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill gives ministers powers to set sanctions of up to ten years’ imprisonment.

The Peers branded ministerial powers to determine which courts can depart from European Court of Justice case law ‘inappropriate’. They highlighted a ‘significant risk’ that these powers could undermine legal certainty, and called on the government to publish in draft any regulations it intends to make using these powers so that ‘substantive consultation’ can take place.

They warned ‘COVID-19 must not blind us to the challenges’ as Parliament scrutinises Brexit.

 

Issue: 7890 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll