header-logo header-logo

Ministry U-turn on immigration fees

01 December 2016
Issue: 7725 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice has dropped a 500% hike in immigration fees which it introduced last month, following opposition from lawyers.

In October, fees for appeals in the Immigration and Asylum Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal rose from £80 to £490 for a decision on papers, and from £140 to £800 for an oral hearing.

Last week, however, the MoJ said it was reversing the increase, with immediate effect. All those who have paid the new fee will be reimbursed. The MoJ said it will also review the role of fees in the Upper Tribunal and consult on new proposals for tribunal fees, including for immigration and asylum cases.

Justice minister Oliver Heald said: “We have listened to the representations that we received.”

Welcoming the announcement, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “These fee increases risked seriously restricting access to justice.”

However, she added: “There is still a great deal to be done to address the problems caused by other recent increases in court and tribunal fees and charges. As the Justice Select Committee reported earlier this year, we have seen a drop of almost 70% in the number of cases brought before employment tribunals, but no real change in success rates.”

Issue: 7725 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll