header-logo header-logo

Misled by wrongs, baffled by rights

17 April 2008 / Anthony Judge
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing , Commercial
printer mail-detail

What redress is available to a misled property buyer? Anthony Judge investigates

Recently there has been much interest in the regulation of estate agents. In February the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) issued proceedings against Foxtons under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/2083) in connection with the contracts they issue to their landlord clients. There has been a flurry of prosecutions against agencies for “flyboarding”—agencies erecting “sold” or “to let” signs without instructions to do so. There was also a warning in January from the Law Society that solicitors were losing work because some estate agents insist that clients use their own Home Information Pack (HIP) provider. A recent case has heightened interest in this sector.

The Buchanan Case

In Lancashire County Council v Buchanan [2004] EWHC 3194 (Admin), an estate agent was cleared of offences under the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 (PMA 1991). Under s 1, it is an offence to make a false or misleading statement about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll