header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008 / Anthony Judge
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Misled by wrongs, baffled by rights

What redress is available to a misled property buyer? Anthony Judge investigates

Recently there has been much interest in the regulation of estate agents. In February the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) issued proceedings against Foxtons under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/2083) in connection with the contracts they issue to their landlord clients. There has been a flurry of prosecutions against agencies for “flyboarding”—agencies erecting “sold” or “to let” signs without instructions to do so. There was also a warning in January from the Law Society that solicitors were losing work because some estate agents insist that clients use their own Home Information Pack (HIP) provider. A recent case has heightened interest in this sector.

The Buchanan Case

In Lancashire County Council v Buchanan [2004] EWHC 3194 (Admin), an estate agent was cleared of offences under the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 (PMA 1991). Under s 1, it is an offence to make a false or misleading statement about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll