header-logo header-logo

17 April 2008 / Anthony Judge
Issue: 7317 / Categories: Features , Property , Housing , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Misled by wrongs, baffled by rights

What redress is available to a misled property buyer? Anthony Judge investigates

Recently there has been much interest in the regulation of estate agents. In February the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) issued proceedings against Foxtons under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/2083) in connection with the contracts they issue to their landlord clients. There has been a flurry of prosecutions against agencies for “flyboarding”—agencies erecting “sold” or “to let” signs without instructions to do so. There was also a warning in January from the Law Society that solicitors were losing work because some estate agents insist that clients use their own Home Information Pack (HIP) provider. A recent case has heightened interest in this sector.

The Buchanan Case

In Lancashire County Council v Buchanan [2004] EWHC 3194 (Admin), an estate agent was cleared of offences under the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 (PMA 1991). Under s 1, it is an offence to make a false or misleading statement about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll