header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Opinion , In-House , Profession
printer mail-detail

Mixed doubles

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Andrew Fulton looks at how the right pairing can serve aces for clients

The Scottish Faculty of Advocates dropped its rule against “mixed doubles” representation last month. This was a prohibition on an independent advocate accepting instructions to appear with an employed solicitor advocate on behalf of the same client. The ban had been in place since 1993 and had provoked concern about restrictive practices. The Office of Fair Trading has welcomed its removal.

There is no prohibition on “mixed doubles” in England. Indeed, Denton Wilde Sapte’s advocacy group has been successfully using this model for many years. As well as appearing in their own right, our advocates are frequently led by top QCs from the commercial Bar. The Scottish Bar is now belatedly acknowledging what we have known for some time, namely that the “mixed doubles” combination can offer clients the best of all worlds. An in-house junior stays far closer both to the client and to the daily ebb and flow of a case than a barrister in chambers. The selection of an external leader

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll