header-logo header-logo

23 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

MPs tell miscarriage of justice watchdog leadership to resign

MPs have called for the resignation of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) leadership, in a scathing report on its handling of the Malkinson case

Andy Slaughter MP, who chairs the cross-party Justice Committee, said the CCRC leadership ‘has shown a remarkable inability to learn from its own mistakes’.

Slaughter said: There is clear evidence in our report that the situation for the CCRC has deteriorated significantly and it now requires root and branch reform.’

The committee’s report, Leadership of the Criminal Cases review Commission, published this week, concludes: ‘As a result of our concerns regarding the performance of the CCRC and the unpersuasive evidence Karen Kneller provided to the Committee, we no longer feel that it is tenable for her to continue as Chief Executive of the CCRC.’

In January, the CCRC’s Chair Helen Pitcher, resigned after the Lord Chancellor convened an independent panel to look at concerns raised about both Pitcher’s response to Andrew Malkinson's acquittal and a CCRC Board decision that she stay in post.

Malkinson was wrongfully convicted in 2004, serving 17 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. The CCRC missed opportunities to refer the case and failed to obtain a police file in 2009 and 2018 which would have altered the outcome.

The Justice Committee questioned Kneller, and Amanda Pearce, Casework Operations Director, in April in the absence of a permanent or interim chair.

Its report concludes it should not have taken an independent review for the CCRC to apologise to Malkinson, that the public statements of the CCRC chair following Malkinson’s acquittal were ‘woefully inadequate’ and ‘showed a worrying lack of understanding of the potential damage to the CCRC's reputation and public confidence’.

The Committee criticised the CCRC for not only ‘failing to offer a timely apology’ but ‘seeking to claim credit for the acquittal’.

The CCRC’s handling of the independent review of the case by Chris Henley KC was ‘incompetent’, the Committee said, concluding: ‘The level of delay and the attempt to minimise the damage to the CCRC's reputation were a spectacular failure of leadership.’

A CCRC spokesperson said: ‘We note the recommendations in the Justice Select Committee report and the committee’s view that its findings should “inform the approach of the next chair of the CCRC” in reviewing how we operate.

‘We look forward to an announcement on the appointment of an interim chair and to working with them in an organisation deeply committed to finding, investigating and referring potential miscarriages of justice.’

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll