header-logo header-logo

M&S PROFILE: Mukesh Kainth

05 December 2016
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail
mukesh_kainth_tfoil_and_browne_jacobson

The new president of Tomorrow's FOIL wishes to encourage the apprenticeship route within the profession

Browne Jacobson insurance law specialist, Mukesh Kainth, has been elected President of Tomorrow’s Forum of Insurance Lawyers (TFOIL). TFOIL is the junior division of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers catering for defendant insurance lawyers with five years’ post-qualification experience or less.

What was your route into the profession?

I undertook a traditional route of a law degree followed by the LPC. Following a 250-mile relocation to the Plymouth coast I was able to secure a training contract with Lyons Davidson. I undertook the contract in the Solihull offices completing seats in defendant insurance, claimant, advocacy and employment. I then moved on to my current role with Browne Jacobson where I have been for five years.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Completing the training contract was quite onerous as it coincided with getting married, moving house and starting a family. Needless to say I managed to come out of the other side! I suspect my next challenge will be establishing myself as a catastrophic defendant injury lawyer.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

I have worked with a considerable number of lawyers in the last 12 years who have all contributed to my development and progression. There are too many to name but each has provided their invaluable experience and broken down stereotypes of what a lawyer should look and sound like.

I have always admired civil right lawyers such as Shami Chakrabarti and Clive Stafford Smith who have promoted the rights of the common person.

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

As strange as it sounds I have always had aspirations of owning a fish and chip shop. Perhaps in the not-too-distant future I may realise this or perhaps have a weekend side-line…although I am not sure it would do much for my waistline!

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

I have always enjoyed watching Judge John Deed and his one man crusade to put people to rights. I also enjoy the US production Suits even though no-one seems to do any work being more pre-occupied with looking good and taking over the world.

What change would you make to the profession?

A lot of change has occurred recently. Importantly, barriers are breaking down allowing differing paths in to the profession rather than the traditional route. I consider we need to encourage the apprenticeship route rather than an expensive course-driven route where a job may not be available at the end.

How do you relax?

I enjoy Motown music and a tipple or two.

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
David Bailey-Vella of Davis Woolfe and chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers explores the new costs budgeting light pilot scheme in this week's NLJ
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
back-to-top-scroll