header-logo header-logo

M&S PROFILE: Philippa Connaughton

25 January 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail
p_connaught_low_res_0005

The Sackers pension partner on the fight to achieve justice for armed forces' widows

Pensions expert Philippa Connaughton recently joined Sackers from RPC.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

In 2014 I was contacted by  Major General John Moore-Bick CBE DL, the then General Secretary of the Forces Pension Society in connection with the Society’s "Justice For Widows" campaign.  They were seeking to remove an archaic provision in the Armed Forces Pension Scheme 75 rules which stopped the continued payment of armed forces’ widow’s pensions for those who chose to co-habit or remarry. Together with the Royal British Legion, senior military personnel, the well-known household names of Kate Adie, Martin Bell and Joanna Lumley, and with backing from Dr Ros Altmann,  the campaign had been gathering momentum with an open letter to The Times published in April 2014.  

Despite the incredible drive and sheer charisma of those leading the campaign, they were coming up against a legal problem. The campaigners were being told that it was not legally possible to make a rule change retrospectively (for those widows already in receipt of pensions) and that even were it possible this would be resisted by government due to the legal precedent it would set, and the knock-on effect it might have on other  public sector schemes.  

My challenge: to help the Justice for Widow’s campaign challenge and overturn government “legal” thinking. In preparing my advice, I discovered the little known Pension and Yeomanry Pay Act 1884 under which the AFPS 75 was established and pored over numerous public sector rules, and I’m told that the advice eventually found its way on to the prime minister’s desk. It was a great honour to play my (small) part in the success of the Justice for Widows campaign. The archaic AFPS 75 rule was changed on 1 April 2015 and impacts 46,000 current Armed Forces widows and potentially up to 350,000 current wives. The biggest challenge of my career has proved to be the singular most rewarding.  

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I’d be an archaeologist. As a child I dug up most of my parents’ garden in Cheshire searching for artefacts and I remain fascinated as to how our ancestors lived their daily lives. These days I have to content myself with re-runs of Time Team and occasional trips to the Museum of London, which contains a fascinating collection of recent finds from excavations in and around London.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Horace Rumpole, the wonderful creation of the late Sir John Mortimer QC. A liberal free-thinking defence lawyer who loved the drama of the court room and was rather anti-establishment—his antics always make me smile. 

How do you relax?

Playing the piano, skiing and playing (competitive) board games with the family. I’ve recently taken up the violin (again) after a break of 25 years. Whether it proves to be as relaxing for the family as it is for me remains to be seen!

 

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll