header-logo header-logo

25 January 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M&S PROFILE: Philippa Connaughton

p_connaught_low_res_0005

The Sackers pension partner on the fight to achieve justice for armed forces' widows

Pensions expert Philippa Connaughton recently joined Sackers from RPC.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

In 2014 I was contacted by  Major General John Moore-Bick CBE DL, the then General Secretary of the Forces Pension Society in connection with the Society’s "Justice For Widows" campaign.  They were seeking to remove an archaic provision in the Armed Forces Pension Scheme 75 rules which stopped the continued payment of armed forces’ widow’s pensions for those who chose to co-habit or remarry. Together with the Royal British Legion, senior military personnel, the well-known household names of Kate Adie, Martin Bell and Joanna Lumley, and with backing from Dr Ros Altmann,  the campaign had been gathering momentum with an open letter to The Times published in April 2014.  

Despite the incredible drive and sheer charisma of those leading the campaign, they were coming up against a legal problem. The campaigners were being told that it was not legally possible to make a rule change retrospectively (for those widows already in receipt of pensions) and that even were it possible this would be resisted by government due to the legal precedent it would set, and the knock-on effect it might have on other  public sector schemes.  

My challenge: to help the Justice for Widow’s campaign challenge and overturn government “legal” thinking. In preparing my advice, I discovered the little known Pension and Yeomanry Pay Act 1884 under which the AFPS 75 was established and pored over numerous public sector rules, and I’m told that the advice eventually found its way on to the prime minister’s desk. It was a great honour to play my (small) part in the success of the Justice for Widows campaign. The archaic AFPS 75 rule was changed on 1 April 2015 and impacts 46,000 current Armed Forces widows and potentially up to 350,000 current wives. The biggest challenge of my career has proved to be the singular most rewarding.  

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I’d be an archaeologist. As a child I dug up most of my parents’ garden in Cheshire searching for artefacts and I remain fascinated as to how our ancestors lived their daily lives. These days I have to content myself with re-runs of Time Team and occasional trips to the Museum of London, which contains a fascinating collection of recent finds from excavations in and around London.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Horace Rumpole, the wonderful creation of the late Sir John Mortimer QC. A liberal free-thinking defence lawyer who loved the drama of the court room and was rather anti-establishment—his antics always make me smile. 

How do you relax?

Playing the piano, skiing and playing (competitive) board games with the family. I’ve recently taken up the violin (again) after a break of 25 years. Whether it proves to be as relaxing for the family as it is for me remains to be seen!

 

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
The controversial Mazur ruling, which caused widespread uncertainty about the role of non-solicitors in litigation work, has been overturned on appeal
Two landmark social media cases in the US could influence social media regulation in the UK, lawyers predict
Barristers have urged the government to set up Nightingale-style specialist courts, with jury trials, to prioritise rape, sexual assault and domestic abuse trials
Victims of violent crimes who suffer life-changing injuries receive less than half the financial support today than those in the 1990s, according to a senior personal injury lawyer
Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned
back-to-top-scroll