header-logo header-logo

25 January 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

M&S PROFILE: Philippa Connaughton

p_connaught_low_res_0005

The Sackers pension partner on the fight to achieve justice for armed forces' widows

Pensions expert Philippa Connaughton recently joined Sackers from RPC.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

In 2014 I was contacted by  Major General John Moore-Bick CBE DL, the then General Secretary of the Forces Pension Society in connection with the Society’s "Justice For Widows" campaign.  They were seeking to remove an archaic provision in the Armed Forces Pension Scheme 75 rules which stopped the continued payment of armed forces’ widow’s pensions for those who chose to co-habit or remarry. Together with the Royal British Legion, senior military personnel, the well-known household names of Kate Adie, Martin Bell and Joanna Lumley, and with backing from Dr Ros Altmann,  the campaign had been gathering momentum with an open letter to The Times published in April 2014.  

Despite the incredible drive and sheer charisma of those leading the campaign, they were coming up against a legal problem. The campaigners were being told that it was not legally possible to make a rule change retrospectively (for those widows already in receipt of pensions) and that even were it possible this would be resisted by government due to the legal precedent it would set, and the knock-on effect it might have on other  public sector schemes.  

My challenge: to help the Justice for Widow’s campaign challenge and overturn government “legal” thinking. In preparing my advice, I discovered the little known Pension and Yeomanry Pay Act 1884 under which the AFPS 75 was established and pored over numerous public sector rules, and I’m told that the advice eventually found its way on to the prime minister’s desk. It was a great honour to play my (small) part in the success of the Justice for Widows campaign. The archaic AFPS 75 rule was changed on 1 April 2015 and impacts 46,000 current Armed Forces widows and potentially up to 350,000 current wives. The biggest challenge of my career has proved to be the singular most rewarding.  

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

I’d be an archaeologist. As a child I dug up most of my parents’ garden in Cheshire searching for artefacts and I remain fascinated as to how our ancestors lived their daily lives. These days I have to content myself with re-runs of Time Team and occasional trips to the Museum of London, which contains a fascinating collection of recent finds from excavations in and around London.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Horace Rumpole, the wonderful creation of the late Sir John Mortimer QC. A liberal free-thinking defence lawyer who loved the drama of the court room and was rather anti-establishment—his antics always make me smile. 

How do you relax?

Playing the piano, skiing and playing (competitive) board games with the family. I’ve recently taken up the violin (again) after a break of 25 years. Whether it proves to be as relaxing for the family as it is for me remains to be seen!

 

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll