header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 October 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7905 / Categories: Features , Military , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The Overseas Operations Bill: Much to defend

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
28860
In the public interest? Michael Zander considers the government’s Overseas Operations Bill

In brief

  • The Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill has reached Committee stage.
  • The Bill has been met with controversy and received much critical attention.

The Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill, which does several controversial things, had its 2nd Reading in the Commons on 23 September and started its Committee stage on 6 October. The Bill provides:

  • A ‘triple-lock’ on criminal proceedings. (1) A statutory presumption against criminal prosecution of service personnel for an offence committed overseas more than five years from the incident. (2) Prosecutors would have to take into account a variety of factors including not only the weight of the evidence, but the ‘exceptional demands and stresses’ of service overseas and the effect the then prevailing conditions are likely to have had on the person’s ability to make sound judgments or exercise self-control, or any other adverse effect on their mental health. (3) Prosecution would require the Attorney
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll