header-logo header-logo

08 October 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7905 / Categories: Features , Military , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The Overseas Operations Bill: Much to defend

28860
In the public interest? Michael Zander considers the government’s Overseas Operations Bill

In brief

  • The Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill has reached Committee stage.
  • The Bill has been met with controversy and received much critical attention.

The Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill, which does several controversial things, had its 2nd Reading in the Commons on 23 September and started its Committee stage on 6 October. The Bill provides:

  • A ‘triple-lock’ on criminal proceedings. (1) A statutory presumption against criminal prosecution of service personnel for an offence committed overseas more than five years from the incident. (2) Prosecutors would have to take into account a variety of factors including not only the weight of the evidence, but the ‘exceptional demands and stresses’ of service overseas and the effect the then prevailing conditions are likely to have had on the person’s ability to make sound judgments or exercise self-control, or any other adverse effect on their mental health. (3) Prosecution would require the Attorney
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll