header-logo header-logo

Multi-jurisdictional cases in England & Russia

26 November 2020 / Daniel Burbeary , Irina Buydova
Issue: 7912 / Categories: Features , Profession , International justice , ADR
printer mail-detail
32878
Daniel Burbeary & Irina Buydova highlight the differences between Russian and English dispute resolution
  • Differences exist between Russian and English court and arbitration proceedings in terms of the role of the judge, evidence and use of experts.

Many of the international, cross-border litigation and arbitration cases that find their way to England concern Russia. Particular challenges may arise due to the conceptual differences between dispute resolution processes in the two jurisdictions. While England is a common law jurisdiction, with an adversarial system, Russia is a civil law jurisdiction, with an inquisitorial system.

In English-style proceedings, parties compete with each other to convince the impartial judge or arbitrator that their case is more meritorious than their opponent’s. The parties are given a good deal of freedom (within the confines of the procedural rules) as to how to present their case, and a judge or arbitrator will not generally enquire beyond the facts presented by the parties and will not look to identify legal causes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll