header-logo header-logo

05 December 2018 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

The myth that Article 50 is a one-way street

David Wolchover explains exactly why Article 50 can be unilaterally rescinded

With the predicted failure of the government to get its Brexit deal through the Commons, the Labour leadership is said to be aiming to initiate a general election via a no confidence vote with plan B, a second People’s Vote incorporating a no-Brexit option. Let us suppose that this time the choice is remain.

Or, indulging in a bit of make-believe, suppose after the debate a Commons majority writes off Brexit altogether as a car crash waiting to happen. In reaching that conclusion, they harness the grave breaches of electoral law and information regulations committed by Leave campaigners as wiping out the legitimacy of the wafer-thin Leave vote. Perhaps it even dawns on some of our less numerate legislators—finally—that to describe the Leave vote by 37% of the registered electorate as expressing the will of the people is an arithmetic absurdity, a mathematical monstrosity.

Since well before the prime minister activated Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll