header-logo header-logo

18 April 2025 / Diane Dickson
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Features , ESG , Environment , Commercial , Construction
printer mail-detail

Navigating the path to net zero

216127
Diane Dickson examines the legal framework for green building, explaining the latest changes & their impact on practitioners & clients
  • The legal framework for green building is dynamic. Significant changes, such as the Carbon Emissions (Buildings) Bill, are on the horizon.
  • Practitioners must guide clients through complex obligations, from biodiversity net gain to whole-life carbon accounting.
  • Future-proofing strategies are essential to meet stricter standards such as the 2025 Future Homes Standard.

Green building refers to the adoption of environmentally sustainable materials, technologies and construction methods aimed at reducing carbon emissions and minimising environmental impact throughout a building’s lifecycle, including its design, construction, operation and refurbishment phases. Over the past decade, green building has evolved from an industry buzzword to a cornerstone of the UK’s climate strategy. With a legally binding commitment to net-zero emissions by 2050, the construction sector plays a critical role in addressing the environmental and societal impacts of climate change.

However, achieving this vision demands more than technological advances or aesthetic shifts;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll