header-logo header-logo

02 April 2024
Categories: Legal News , Non disclosure agreements
printer mail-detail

NDA legislation promised as Chalk cracks down on gagging orders

Legislation will be introduced to reform Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) ‘as soon as parliamentary time allows’, ministers have confirmed

In an announcement last week, the Lord Chancellor, Alex Chalk KC said the changes would clarify that NDAs cannot be legally enforced if they prevent victims from reporting a crime. The legislation will ensure information relating to criminal conduct can be discussed without fear of legal action with police, crime investigation or prosecution bodies, lawyers and support services such as counsellors, advocacy services, or medical professionals, which operate under clear confidentiality principles.

Chalk said NDAs ‘are too often used to sweep criminality under the carpet and prevent victims from accessing the advice and support they need’.

Provisions in NDAs relating to commercially sensitive information or other obligations not relevant to criminal conduct will retain their legal effects.

Chair of the Bar Council, Sam Townend KC, said: ‘The issue of NDAs is ripe for legislative change.

‘Some NDAs are abusive in nature. NDAs can't cover criminal acts and under existing common law protections many are already unenforceable but those who are asked to sign them are not always aware of the relevant legal principles and may not have timely access to legal advice.

‘Legislative change should aim to put these matters beyond doubt. Getting the wording and definitions right will be important and we look forward to working with the government and others on this.’

Earlier this month, a Legal Services Board (LSB) summary report, ‘The misuse of NDAs: call for evidence themes and summary of evidence’, found evidence of NDAs being used to cover up illegal conduct and promote imbalances of power. The report included responses from 74 individuals with personal experience including imbalances of power such as employer/employee, divorce and consumer disputes, access to justice issues and a lack of understanding about legal rights. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll