header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Features , Local government , Media , Public
printer mail-detail

A necessary evil?

Does banning political adverts on television breach freedom of expression laws? Neil Parpworth reports

Section 321(2) of the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003) prohibits political advertising on the television. In the recent case of R (on the application of Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15, [2008] All ER (D) 155 (Mar) the House of Lords was required to determine a leapfrog appeal from a decision of the Divisional Court in which that court had refused to declare the provision incompatible with Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention): (see [2006] EWHC 3069 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 30 (Dec)).

It should be noted, in passing, that the appellants did not pursue an alternative claim before the Divisional Court to the effect that the provisions containing the prohibition should be “read down” under s 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) since it was common ground that the wording of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll