header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Negligence hurts NHS

The NHS bill for clinical negligence continues to rise each year, according to the Clinical Negligence Annual Report 2011 published by Penningtons Solicitors LLP.

In 2010, clinical negligence claims rose by more than nine per cent while the amount paid out in damages by the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) increased six per cent to more than £650m. NHS trusts paid £756m in damages and costs for clinical negligence claims. The total value of obstetrics and gynaecology specialty claims reached £4.4bn in 2010, 18.7% higher than the 2009 claim value of £3.7bn. Surgery accounted for £1.8bn of claims and medicine saw claims totalling £1.4bn.

Phillipa Luscombe, Penningtons clinical negligence partner and co-author of the report, says: “It is frustrating that NHS trusts fail to learn from their mistakes. Contributions from NHS trusts towards damages and costs payments in 2009–10 were £756m with the highest from any individual trust being £13.9m. Surely it would be better for trusts and patients alike if this money was spent on improving standards of patient care rather than unsuccessfully fighting negligence claims.

“It is surprising that the NHSLA still holds out for so long in many cases before either admitting liability or entering negotiations. A full admission is often only made and a settlement negotiated just a few weeks from trial.”

Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll