header-logo header-logo

Network de-railed?

34764
Jessica Learmond-Criqui examines the ongoing legal challenge to the government’s decision making process in relation to the UK’s 5G developing network

The UK’s 5G developing network has hit the headlines regularly over the past year, with the government recently introducing the Telecommunications (Security) Bill, which would provide additional safeguards to the country’s telecoms infrastructure and provide new powers to remove high risk vendors such as Huawei. Another legal development in relation to 5G is currently ongoing—an important legal challenge to the government’s decision making process. A judicial review was launched in September by a Mr Watts to challenge the decision in July 2020 by the Secretary of State for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government to remove planning permission requirements for the siting of masts, antennae and related equipment up and down the country as the UK gears up for 5G.

The government conducted a public consultation in 2019 into views about removing planning permission from the siting of masts etc

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll