header-logo header-logo

14 August 2013 / Erika Rackley , Erika Rackley
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The Neuberger Experiment

manwoman

Do female judges change the substance of decision-making, asks Erika Rackley

Is it possible to isolate the potential impact of gender, as distinct from any other identity characteristic, in any given judgment?

While few would argue against the importance of a diverse judiciary, the view that the inclusion of different perspectives on the bench would alter—let alone enrich—the substance and quality of judicial decision-making, remains controversial.

One reason for this is that there have been doubts as to how, if at all, the identity characteristics of any given judge affect how they judge, and still less whether any potential differences can be correlated and corroborated across gender, ethnicity, etc. Even if we are agreed that, on balance, it is likely that gender makes some difference to judicial decision-making, we might think that until we can demonstrate how women and men differ in their judging, arguments for increasing diversity on this basis cannot get off the ground. But how might we prove this?

The Neuberger Experiment

In May 2013, BBC Radio 4’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll