Fremder's essay explores whether the UK’s legal framework and practice guidance adequately support neurodivergent individuals in family justice proceedings. She highlights the strengths of existing laws, such as the Family Procedure Rules 2010 and Practice Direction 3AA, which mandate early identification and tailored adjustments to ensure meaningful participation. She also praises the Family Justice Council’s guidance for promoting a strengths-based approach.
However, the essay identifies persistent challenges in implementation, including inconsistent practice and limited training among legal professionals. Fremder calls for reforms such as mandatory training, improved communication tools, and stronger collaboration across services.
Her winning entry underscores the importance of recognising neurodiversity as a valued aspect of human variation and ensuring equal access to justice for all.
The Professor Jo Delahunty KC Essay Competition focuses on neurodiversity, with essays limited to a maximum of 1,000 words. Professor Jo Delahunty KC, of 4PB, acts as sole judge and funds the prize of £500 to the author of the winning essay.
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=1da8eda2_1)
