header-logo header-logo

New child maintenance rules may neglect single parents

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Government seeking to reduce burden on statutory schemes

Rules aimed at eradicating child poverty and providing a cost effective service for the taxpayer may lead to single parent families missing out.

Rules regarding child maintenance, which encourage ex-couples to reach their own arrangements voluntarily, came into force this week. Those that fail to reach an agreement are to face action from the newly instigated Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission (CMEC).

Janet Paraskeva, chairman of the CMEC, says: “We need to put the interests of children first and disconnecting maintenance payments from the benefits system is an important step forward.”

However, Richard Bebb, a partner at Thring Townsend Lee & Pembertons, says there is concern that single parent families who are unable to make their own arrangements may miss out altogether. There will certainly be parents that would prefer to be treated responsibly, and not be forced to use a state scheme...for unlucky single parents who cannot reach agreement, and who might not claim benefits within a voluntary system, their children may be the biggest losers in the government’s new strategy to tackle child poverty,” he says.

Bebb says that despite assurances from the CMEC that nobody will be forced to opt out of the statutory service and that it will remain available for those unable to reach private arrangements, research conducted by family charities found that up to 24% of lone parents within a voluntary system may go without child maintenance. “It seems clear that the government is trying to reduce the burden on the statutory scheme and thereby render it more effective than the Child Support Agency has been. However, single parents in receipt of benefits could be seen as a soft target because any maintenance received is simply deducted from benefits,” he adds.
 

Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll