header-logo header-logo

05 June 2008
Issue: 7324 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

New consumer laws to hit auction sites

Legal news

Auction sites like eBay may fall foul of new laws which make it illegal for traders to pretend they are consumers making a private sale, lawyers say.

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPRs) and the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations (BPRs) came into force last week, implementing the EC Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. The CPRs affect businesses that deal with consumers, while the BPRs apply to business-to-business promotional practices. The Trade Descriptions Act 1968 which outlawed “false descriptions” of goods was swept aside.

Dai Davis, partner at Brooke North LLP, says the regulations impose a duty on trading standards officers to prosecute traders who make out they are private sellers. He says: “This legislation may catch eBay itself since the only defence that a trader will have is one of where the trader can show that the commission of the offence was due to information supplied by a third party and that he took ‘all reasonable precautions and exercised all due diligence’ to avoid committing the offence.”

The new rules, he says, are also designed to get tough on spammers, with persistent and unwanted advertisements sent by e-mail becoming a criminal offence.

Issue: 7324 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll