header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A new era for IP disputes?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
04 November 2010 / Louisa Albertini
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Louisa Albertini discusses regime change at the Patents County Court

The rules regarding cases before the Patents County Court (PCC) were amended last month with a view to making it a more attractive venue in which to determine intellectual property disputes. This development has the potential to bring fundamental changes to the way in which intellectual property disputes are dealt with in England and Wales, with more cases being brought before the PCC, and cases being determined more quickly and at less expense than in the High Court. However, some commentators are concerned that these changes could dilute the thorough examination of cases for which the courts in England and Wales are renowned.

Need for reform

The PCC was established in 1990 to serve the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with the aim of providing an affordable forum for intellectual property litigation. However, despite the good intentions behind its establishment, the PCC was not a particularly popular forum. For example, it has been estimated that in 2006 there were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll