header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 November 2010 / Louisa Albertini
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A new era for IP disputes?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Louisa Albertini discusses regime change at the Patents County Court

The rules regarding cases before the Patents County Court (PCC) were amended last month with a view to making it a more attractive venue in which to determine intellectual property disputes. This development has the potential to bring fundamental changes to the way in which intellectual property disputes are dealt with in England and Wales, with more cases being brought before the PCC, and cases being determined more quickly and at less expense than in the High Court. However, some commentators are concerned that these changes could dilute the thorough examination of cases for which the courts in England and Wales are renowned.

Need for reform

The PCC was established in 1990 to serve the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with the aim of providing an affordable forum for intellectual property litigation. However, despite the good intentions behind its establishment, the PCC was not a particularly popular forum. For example, it has been estimated that in 2006 there were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll