header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

A new era for IP disputes?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
04 November 2010 / Louisa Albertini
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Louisa Albertini discusses regime change at the Patents County Court

The rules regarding cases before the Patents County Court (PCC) were amended last month with a view to making it a more attractive venue in which to determine intellectual property disputes. This development has the potential to bring fundamental changes to the way in which intellectual property disputes are dealt with in England and Wales, with more cases being brought before the PCC, and cases being determined more quickly and at less expense than in the High Court. However, some commentators are concerned that these changes could dilute the thorough examination of cases for which the courts in England and Wales are renowned.

Need for reform

The PCC was established in 1990 to serve the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with the aim of providing an affordable forum for intellectual property litigation. However, despite the good intentions behind its establishment, the PCC was not a particularly popular forum. For example, it has been estimated that in 2006 there were only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll