header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 May 2015 / Tobias Caspary , James Kitching , Leigh Mallon
Issue: 7650 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail

A new frontier

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_may_1_mallon

Leigh Mallon, James Kitching & Tobias Caspary explore opt-out “class-actions” for competition law damages actions in the UK

In recent years there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes aimed at simplifying the process by which those who suffer loss as a result of competition law breaches can obtain compensation. The latest amendments to the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998), via the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015), were passed in the last weeks of the most recent UK Parliament. The changes, which are expected to come into force on 1 October 2015, include:

  • increasing the types of competition law cases that the Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) hears; and
  • introducing a right to bring opt-out collective actions and to enter into opt-out collective settlements for infringements of competition rules.

These changes are likely to result in a significant increase in the number and type of competition-based damages claims brought in the UK with a corresponding increase in the likelihood that businesses will find themselves as claimants or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll