header-logo header-logo

27 March 2008 / Edwina Millward
Issue: 7314 / Categories: Features , Public , Regulatory , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A new partnership

Edwina Millward is optimistic that the Ministry of Justice can benefit both the prison service and the courts

Rapid change and the judiciary are extremely rare bedfellows. So, after the attempts by the former lord chancellor, Lord Falconer, to abolish himself in June 2003, the signing of the Concordat in January 2004, the passing of the Constitutional Reform Act in 2005 and then its implementation in April 2006, the judiciary had hoped for a period of consolidation as the lord chief justice settled into his new role as head of the judiciary. However, barely had he assumed his new responsibilities than there were leaks of the possible creation of a Ministry of Justice (MOJ), to include prisons and probation, in place of the much smaller Department for Constitutional Affairs.

For the judiciary, their concerns over the creation of the MOJ were twofold. One was its effect on their independence; clear water had to be placed between Her Majesty’s Court Service (HMCS) as the vehicle through which judges do their business and those

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll