header-logo header-logo

New review

05 September 2014 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
public_davies

Keith Davies examines the development of the principle of judicial review in English courts

Judicial review is a term not known to English or UK law until very recent times, ie 1977, in secondary legislation, namely the Rules of the Supreme Court (Amendment No 3) 1977 (SI 1977/1955), Ord 53. In primary legislation it then appeared in the Supreme Court Act 1981 (now re-titled the Senior Courts Act 1981) s 31(1): “A procedure to be known as an application for judicial review.”

Origins

The procedure, though not the title, is in essence very old, dating back to medieval times as part of a larger grouping of “prerogative orders” including other orders such as “habeas corpus”, previously termed “prerogative writs” issued by the Crown to correct errors made by inferior courts (eg magistrates) and all other public bodies up to the level of ministers of the Crown. The common law is created by the Crown in Parliament to be administered by the highest courts of common law and equity, the central judiciary of the UK.

“Judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll