header-logo header-logo

05 September 2014 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

New review

public_davies

Keith Davies examines the development of the principle of judicial review in English courts

Judicial review is a term not known to English or UK law until very recent times, ie 1977, in secondary legislation, namely the Rules of the Supreme Court (Amendment No 3) 1977 (SI 1977/1955), Ord 53. In primary legislation it then appeared in the Supreme Court Act 1981 (now re-titled the Senior Courts Act 1981) s 31(1): “A procedure to be known as an application for judicial review.”

Origins

The procedure, though not the title, is in essence very old, dating back to medieval times as part of a larger grouping of “prerogative orders” including other orders such as “habeas corpus”, previously termed “prerogative writs” issued by the Crown to correct errors made by inferior courts (eg magistrates) and all other public bodies up to the level of ministers of the Crown. The common law is created by the Crown in Parliament to be administered by the highest courts of common law and equity, the central judiciary of the UK.

“Judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll