header-logo header-logo

Nigeria wins $11bn victory against exploitative fraudsters

25 October 2023
Issue: 8046 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-detail
The Federal Republic of Nigeria has won its High Court challenge against an $11bn arbitration award granted to Process & Industrial Developments (PID), a hedge fund-backed company registered in the British Virgin Islands

The dispute arose from a 20-page gas supply and processing document agreed between the two parties in 2010. A dispute followed, which went to an arbitral tribunal as per the agreement, where in 2017 Nigeria was found to be in breach and liable to pay PID $6.6bn at 7% interest, bringing the amount at stake up to $11bn, which would have had significant financial implications for the Nigerian economy.

Ruling in Federal Republic of Nigeria v Process & Industrial Developments [2023] EWHC 2638 (Comm), Mr Justice Knowles said: ‘Nigeria did almost nothing to perform the [agreement] after signing but, according to Nigeria, neither did the other party.’

Knowles J found that PID obtained the arbitral award ‘only by practising the most severe abuses of the arbitral process’. In a lengthy judgment, he found PID and certain individuals associated with it had committed bribery, relied on knowingly false evidence and corruptly and improperly obtained Nigeria’s internal legal documents to benefit its own position in the arbitration.

He highlighted the impact of the ‘remarkable but very real’ case on the reputation of arbitration as a dispute resolution process, stating: ‘The risk is that arbitration as a process becomes less reliable, less able to find difficult but important new legal ground, and more vulnerable to fraud.’

Shaistah Akhtar (pictured), partner at Mishcon de Reya, who led Nigeria's legal team, said the judgment was ‘a historic result for Nigeria and its people.

‘The Nigerian government's resolve in pursuing a just outcome led to it uncovering overwhelming evidence of bribery and corruption. We are pleased that the judge recognised the severity of the fraud perpetrated against the people of Nigeria in his judgment, and trust that this landmark decision will deter other potential fraudsters and their backers from exploiting the legal system in the pursuit of monetary gain.’

A Federal Republic of Nigeria spokesperson said: ‘The brazen fraud perpetrated by PID has finally been revealed for all to see despite their consistent attempts to frustrate the passage of justice.’

Issue: 8046 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
back-to-top-scroll