header-logo header-logo

03 September 2021 / David Langwallner
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Nightingale courts: challenges, dangers & ethics

56074
Law in the hotel lobby: David Langwallner examines the dilemmas arising from the relocation of trials to temporary courtrooms

A nightingale is a rural migratory Songbird known for the quality of its voice, less in evidence in the UK as bird stocks decline. The government established Nightingale courts last year—presumably in recognition of Florence Nightingale and her work during the Crimean War, rather than dulcet-toned barristers.

In Richard Cavendish’s monograph ‘The Crimean War’ (History Today, Volume 54 Issue, 3 March 2004) he argues that the war displayed great confusions of purpose and motivations, and in a remark curiously prescient to our time: ‘never did such incompetence led to so much social butchery’. It lasted two years, five months and 14 days with over half a million dead. The coronavirus began in Wuhan in December 2019.

Blurred lines

The Nightingales formed part of government plans to ensure courts could recover from the coronavirus pandemic as soon as possible and (with emphasis added from the government website)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll