header-logo header-logo

Nightingale courts: challenges, dangers & ethics

03 September 2021 / David Langwallner
Issue: 7946 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
56074
Law in the hotel lobby: David Langwallner examines the dilemmas arising from the relocation of trials to temporary courtrooms

A nightingale is a rural migratory Songbird known for the quality of its voice, less in evidence in the UK as bird stocks decline. The government established Nightingale courts last year—presumably in recognition of Florence Nightingale and her work during the Crimean War, rather than dulcet-toned barristers.

In Richard Cavendish’s monograph ‘The Crimean War’ (History Today, Volume 54 Issue, 3 March 2004) he argues that the war displayed great confusions of purpose and motivations, and in a remark curiously prescient to our time: ‘never did such incompetence led to so much social butchery’. It lasted two years, five months and 14 days with over half a million dead. The coronavirus began in Wuhan in December 2019.

Blurred lines

The Nightingales formed part of government plans to ensure courts could recover from the coronavirus pandemic as soon as possible and (with emphasis added from the government website)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll