header-logo header-logo

22 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Covid-19 , Human rights , Diversity , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Nightingale Courts & Labour pledges

Lawyers have welcomed plans to keep 24 Nightingale Courts open for another year, but warned more was needed to tackle the backlog of cases.

‘We know there are already Nightingale Courts sitting empty due to a lack of judges,’ Law Society president Lubna Shuja said.

‘The most pressing issue is there are not enough lawyers, court staff or judges to cover all the outstanding cases. Long-term investment is needed across the whole criminal justice system to remedy this.’

The Ministry of Justice said the crown court backlog had peaked at 62,000 in October 2022 during the strike action by the Criminal Bar, but fell by nearly 800 cases during the final two months of the year.

Bar Council chair Nick Vineall KC said keeping the courts open would help maintain capacity levels. However, he warned: ‘The large backlogs in court cases existed before the COVID pandemic and tackling it requires increased investment and increased capacity.’

Last week, shadow justice secretary Steve Reed set out Labour’s priorities for the justice system, in a speech at Middle Temple.

Condemning the Lord Chancellor’s Bill of Rights as ‘a Rights Reduction Act’, Reed said a Labour government would protect both the Human Rights Act and the UK’s European Convention on Human Rights membership, and could bring in new rights, for example, to clean air or adequate health care.

He said he would increase the number of crown prosecutors by 50% by allowing associate prosecutors to take on a bigger role, and would open specialist courts in order to speed up and prioritise the prosecution of rape cases.

On judicial diversity, Reed said he supported extending non-traditional routes to the judiciary, which could see more employed barristers and legal executives becoming judges.

He pledged a clampdown on SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation), with ‘tough penalties against abusive litigation’ and protection against excessive costs. Last week, the Solicitors Regulation Authority revealed it currently has 40 live investigations linked to SLAPPs, and warned that concerns about abusive litigation such as potentially ruinous but unmerited defamation proceedings have increased since the invasion of Ukraine.

Vineall KC said the proposals were ‘interesting’ and he looked forward to further discussions.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll