header-logo header-logo

Nightingale Courts & Labour pledges

22 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Covid-19 , Human rights , Diversity , Defamation
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have welcomed plans to keep 24 Nightingale Courts open for another year, but warned more was needed to tackle the backlog of cases.

‘We know there are already Nightingale Courts sitting empty due to a lack of judges,’ Law Society president Lubna Shuja said.

‘The most pressing issue is there are not enough lawyers, court staff or judges to cover all the outstanding cases. Long-term investment is needed across the whole criminal justice system to remedy this.’

The Ministry of Justice said the crown court backlog had peaked at 62,000 in October 2022 during the strike action by the Criminal Bar, but fell by nearly 800 cases during the final two months of the year.

Bar Council chair Nick Vineall KC said keeping the courts open would help maintain capacity levels. However, he warned: ‘The large backlogs in court cases existed before the COVID pandemic and tackling it requires increased investment and increased capacity.’

Last week, shadow justice secretary Steve Reed set out Labour’s priorities for the justice system, in a speech at Middle Temple.

Condemning the Lord Chancellor’s Bill of Rights as ‘a Rights Reduction Act’, Reed said a Labour government would protect both the Human Rights Act and the UK’s European Convention on Human Rights membership, and could bring in new rights, for example, to clean air or adequate health care.

He said he would increase the number of crown prosecutors by 50% by allowing associate prosecutors to take on a bigger role, and would open specialist courts in order to speed up and prioritise the prosecution of rape cases.

On judicial diversity, Reed said he supported extending non-traditional routes to the judiciary, which could see more employed barristers and legal executives becoming judges.

He pledged a clampdown on SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation), with ‘tough penalties against abusive litigation’ and protection against excessive costs. Last week, the Solicitors Regulation Authority revealed it currently has 40 live investigations linked to SLAPPs, and warned that concerns about abusive litigation such as potentially ruinous but unmerited defamation proceedings have increased since the invasion of Ukraine.

Vineall KC said the proposals were ‘interesting’ and he looked forward to further discussions.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll