header-logo header-logo

NLJ CAREER PROFILE: Judge Cooke, President of the Property Litigation Association

09 June 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Judge Elizabeth Cooke, the newly appointed President of the Property Litigation Association, discusses her journey to becoming a judge and her fantastical dream job as an archaeologist...

What was your route into the profession?

I read classics at university, and wanted a career involving both intellectual challenge and contact with people. I qualified as a solicitor in 1988.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Becoming a judge has been my biggest career challenge so far. I became a full-time judge in 2015 after some years as an academic and then a Law Commissioner; I moved to the Lands Chamber of the Upper Tribunal in 2019 and am also a Deputy High Court Judge. It’s a wonderful job, endlessly interesting and challenging. The court is a bit like a theatre—often very staged and sometimes dramatic; everybody is on trial and at risk, not just the parties but also in different ways the witnesses, the advocates, and even the judge.

Litigation is bad for people because it is stressful and expensive; but for all that, if negotiation fails and mediation is impossible then a well-managed civil trial can be a sort of closure and a way out of conflict. It is a privilege to manage that process, to do what I can to keep it civilised, and to find solutions.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you the most?

I am inspired by all my colleagues in the Lands Chamber of the Upper Tribunal and I learn from them daily.

If you’re asking for an individual, I would have to say Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman advocate in the first century BC. The legal profession was not as we now know it but the seeds were there, and Cicero developed the art of oral advocacy, which we need to cherish and preserve in the face of today’s trend towards extensive written submissions. He had the confidence to be succinct: on one famous occasion, an extortion trial, he gave up the right to make an opening speech in order to present the crucial evidence before the trial was timed out by the peculiarities of the Roman calendar, and he won. He had a turbulent career but in the end, after many blunders, he showed great courage amidst constitutional turmoil.

If you weren't a judge, what would you choose as an alternative career?

Musician? No, my music is for fun. Classics teacher? No, I haven’t the skills or the patience; but I taught Latin and Greek to my daughter, who is now a brilliant classics teacher. If pure fantasy is allowed, then I would have liked to be an archaeologist—especially if I could miss out the actual digging and just float into a Roman fort dispensing inspiration and insight.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

I don't really have a favourite, but I enjoy the characters in John Grisham's novels.

What change would you make to the profession?

I would like practising lawyers to have a much bigger voice in law reform. The idea that lawyers encourage conflict is now largely de-bunked; litigators are good at resolving disputes and are best placed to know what will work and what will prevent or provoke litigation.

If practising lawyers were routinely consulted while policy is being formed and before legislation is drafted a lot of problems could be avoided. This is one of the key focuses of the Property Litigation Association, and one of the reasons why I am so pleased to have been appointed their President.

And I would get rid of fancy dress in the courts!

How do you relax?

I am an early music nerd (Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque music) and I spend a lot of happy time with my harpsichord. I like cooking, but my son does it much better than I do and I prefer eating what he makes. I run about 25 miles a week, and am a rather timid rock-climber. Best of all I love being with my family.

Judge Elizabeth Cooke is the President of the Property Litigation Association (PLA).

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
back-to-top-scroll