header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The NLJ column

A significant proportion of Tony Blair’s reforms have been forced upon him by crisis

When reflecting on the Prime Minister’s legal legacy it is instructive to evaluate the psychology and impetus of the man who has brought in more criminal legislation than any government in recent times.

Essential to an understanding of Blair’s approach is to realise how important it was for him to break away from the previous reputation of latter-day Labour governments. Those administrations had become synonymous with the free living, free thinking years of the 1960s. The consequent Conservative governments realised that the electorate liked their law tough.
So it was “tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime” that announced New Labour’s entry into Downing Street. It was rhetoric that got them elected, never again could Labour be seen to be soft.

Terrorism

Perhaps the whole of New Labour’s attitude to criminal law making can be encapsulated in its approach to the perceived terrorist threat.
The mantra “education, education, education” would be replaced with “legislation, legislation, legislation” as New

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll