header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The NLJ column

A significant proportion of Tony Blair’s reforms have been forced upon him by crisis

When reflecting on the Prime Minister’s legal legacy it is instructive to evaluate the psychology and impetus of the man who has brought in more criminal legislation than any government in recent times.

Essential to an understanding of Blair’s approach is to realise how important it was for him to break away from the previous reputation of latter-day Labour governments. Those administrations had become synonymous with the free living, free thinking years of the 1960s. The consequent Conservative governments realised that the electorate liked their law tough.
So it was “tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime” that announced New Labour’s entry into Downing Street. It was rhetoric that got them elected, never again could Labour be seen to be soft.

Terrorism

Perhaps the whole of New Labour’s attitude to criminal law making can be encapsulated in its approach to the perceived terrorist threat.
The mantra “education, education, education” would be replaced with “legislation, legislation, legislation” as New

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll